HomeAllocationsNew Reg. FeesSector Inv. PlanRoad Fund FAQFeedbackVital ResourcesContact Us

 

 

.

OVERVIEW

Transport SectorSector ReformsPolicy IssuesFinance Bill

Road Network

Road ProjectsSector Funding

RSDP II

URF Organisation

Budget Allocation

FAQs-Road Fund

 

 

Updates

Bids and Tenders

Meetings

VacanciesYour FeedbackContact Us

 

The Uganda Road Fund-FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Here are a few likely questions and answers to numerous issues pertaining to the Uganda Road Fund. Visitors are invited to contact the Uganda Road Fund for further clarification on issues that may not be elaborately addressed on this page.

QN: Now that road license fees have been abolished with effect from 1st July 2007, what happens to vehicle owners who had not paid the fees due by then?

All those with arrears have been forgiven.

QN: What about those who paid beyond 30th June 2007, will they be refunded?

It not possible to refund because we do not have a framework to do so. It would be very difficult and cumbersome. It is unfortunate that our very dedicated and compliant tax payers have been penalized. We sincerely apologize for it.

QN: Isn’t the Road Fund a ploy by Government to increase taxes and yet road users are already paying too much?

The Road Fund is part of the institutional reforms aimed at commercializing with a view of:

  1. Making the road maintenance needs and expenditures more visible by involving road users in the ownership and management of roads.  This is to be achieved by having strong representation of road users in the oversight Boards of the Road Fund and the Roads Authority, and informing the general road user about development in the sub-sector.
  2. Ensuring sustainable flow of resources for road maintenance by introducing road user charges and moving roads outside the budget and treating them like a business

QN: Will it finance maintenance only or will it also finance improvements and new works?

The Road Fund will mainly finance routine and periodic maintenance because our main problem is maintaining the asset that we have.

Other eligible expenditures include:

  • Road safety activities and selected projects;
  • Operational expenses of the Roads Authority;
  • Administrative expenses of the Fund;
  • Research related to maintenance of roads; and
  • Such other relevant activities as may be determined by the Board.

Improvements and new works should only be considered once the maintenance needs have been adequately covered and there is a surplus.

QN: Fuel is already over-taxed, won’t the fuel levy be a burden on the road users?  Won’t it lead to smuggling?

Studies have shown that investing $ 1 on road maintenance saves about $ 3.5 on vehicle operating costs (shock absorbers, bushes, springs, fuel consumption etc.) – road users are currently spending more than 3 times what they would be paying if the roads were in good condition.  Their burden should therefore reduce if the money they pay is directed to ensuring a good road network.

We however need to diversify our sources of revenue between the fuel levy and vehicle license fees to avoid a very high increase in the price of fuel.

QN: We are members of regional organizations and cannot impose our own charges without consultation with the other partners. What is in place to address this scenario?

In the East African Community it is only Uganda which does not have a Road Fund.  Among our neighbors it is only DRC and Sudan who also don’t have.

The other countries are already imposing road user charges as a means of raising revenues for their Road Funds.  Kenya with effect from July 2006 abolished vehicles license fees in favour of a fuel levy and raised their fuel levy from about 6 US cents to 11 US cents/litre. Tanzania’s fuel levy is about 8 US Cents/Litre.

QN: What are the sources of revenue for the Road Fund?

  • Fuel levy;
  • International transit fees (cross-border charges)
  • Weight-distance charges;
  • Axle load fines;
  • Bridge, and road tolls collected by the Fund; and
  • Fees levied by the Fund for its services.

Other sources of funding include appropriations by Parliament, as well as Funding from Development Partners.

Top

QN: How will the Road User Charges be set?

Road users are already paying taxes and fees associated with road use but these are part of government taxes which are deposited into the consolidated fund and used to finance Government expenditure.

The sources identified above shall be converted to road user charges and the calculation of the amounts paid should as much as possible ensure that they compensate for the damage imposed on the roads. These revenues would be remitted directly to the Road Fund. The Minister may determine the road user charges from time on the recommendation of the Board.

QN: Disadvantage of recovering revenue from road license through the fuel levy

  1. It does not compensate for the damage on the roads. The load related cost imposed by an articulated truck is more than 10 times as much as that imposed by a small car, but only uses about 4 times as much fuel.
  2. An increase in fuel prices arising from this fuel levy will constrain the Road Fund from raising additional revenue from road users because this will be the only flexible instrument at its disposal.  This is the very reason why many Road Funds in Sub-Saharan Africa are failing to raise their road tariffs - more than 90% of their revenues are from the fuel levy. 
  3. The African Road Maintenance Funds Association (ARMFA) in their meeting of September 2006 recommended diversification to sources of revenues to vehicle licenses among others by 2008.
  4. High price of fuel would promote smuggling and adulteration of fuel

QN: What is the experience of Kenya and Tanzania?

Kenya abolished the license fees in July 2006 and the revenues have increased significantly but note that they have lost the opportunity to enforce insurance of vehicles and tracking the usage of vehicles.

Tanzania was charging a flat fee of Tshs. 20,000/= (Ushs. 30,000/=) per vehicle but in this Financial Year, 2007/08, it has increased the rates and charges according to vehicle category – motor cycles; Saloon cars; Station Wagons; pick-ups etc.  Motorcycles are proposed to pay the lowest i.e.  Tshs. 20,000/= and Heavy good vehicles >10t the highest i.e. Tshs. 350,000/= (Ushs. 525,000/=)

Top

QN: Why not introduce Road Tolls?

This may be introduced in future.  We are soon launching a study to determine its feasibility.

Many Road Funds in Africa are now reconsidering road tolls especially on roads that are concessioned to private investors.  Ghana has a public road which is tolled with the collection contracted out.

QN: How will non-road users in the construction, manufacturing and agricultural sectors be exempted from paying the fuel levy?

A rebate system (refund) may be introduced especially for power generation which is visible and easy to monitor. Otherwise for others it is not recommended right now because the off-road use is relatively small; the system is open to abuse; and administrative cost is too high.

QN: What will be the sector interventions in introducing efficiency measures?

Our current allocation for road maintenance is about $ 40 million for national roads and $ 12 million for district and urban roads, which is less than 50% of the needs estimated at about $ 120 million - $ 70 million is for national roads and  $ 50 million for district and urban roads.

QN: Why should the Fund be placed under the Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development and not Works and Transport?

This is based on best international practice for clear separation of roles leading to more accountability and oversight. The Road Fund Boards normally have more day to day interaction with the Ministers of Finance than Works because it is a financing mechanism.

Top

QN: How can quality be addressed in the event that we have non-technical people on the Board?

The road user is the best person to determine whether a road is well maintained. The Road Fund Board may constitute representatives of organizations with interest in well-maintained roads:

  1. Business community – concerned about the effect of the cost of transport in their eventual output/profit
  2. Passenger transporters – use the roads most frequently and are interested in smooth rides.
  3. Freight transporters – use heavy trucks which destroy the roads most
  4. Farmers Association – transport costs affect their farm gate prices and they constitute the biggest population of country ably represent the rural population
  5. Professional – such as engineers and accountants provide the technical backing to the Board.

QN: What would be the mandate of the Representatives of the different Interest Groups?

Their major function should be to:

  1. Set and revise the Fund's objectives;
  2. Appoint the Chief Executive;
  3. Monitor and evaluate the performance of the Fund;
  4. Recommend adjustments in charging instruments, and;
  5. Provide the interface between the road using public and relevant government ministries.
  6. How shall the Board be safeguarded from political interference?

Members of the Board shall be nominated by the organizations that they represent and shall be expected to provide feed back to their constituents.

QN: How can a Secretariat of 10 staff manage to collect all the revenue projected?

The collection of the fuel levy is simple and inexpensive to administer and shall be collected by URA.  In 2005/6 URA deployed only 7 officials to monitor the 28 registered oil companies.  The companies paid their taxes at only three points: Malaba, Busia and Port Bell. The collection of other sources of revenue will be through URA or contracted out.

QN: What safeguards are in place to avoid misuse of the funds?

The separation of the Road Agency and the Road Fund and an independent Board is expected to ensure better oversight in the utilization of funds. Regular technical and financial audits shall be carried out by the Auditor General, or an Auditor appointed by the Board in consultation with the Auditor General. The Fund is expected to operate sound financial systems

QN: Isn't it likely that the Road Fund will encourage other sectors to demand for the Creation of Funds?

It shall be noted that setting up a Road Fund does not increase resources from the budget allocated to roads.  The road users have to pay for the extra resources to finance the gap. So any sector, which feels that it has a service to sell and a market that can afford to consume its product, may commercialize and raise extra revenues through user charges.

QN: What is the experience of other countries that have established road funds?

A Discussion Paper by the World Bank, "Road Funds in Sub-Saharan Africa: A reality check, (September 2006) has the following analysis:

Some Indicators of Performance of  “Second Generation” Road Funds in SSA

 

- 27 active road funds are in place – of which 9 established since 2000 and 7 in Francophone Africa

- 18 out of 27 are established by a law

- 12 with a board with private sector majority

- 14 road funds rely 80% or more on road user charges as revenues

- In nearly all cases, fuel levy is the principal means of raising road user charges

- Average fuel levy in US cents/liter is 8 and 7 for petrol and diesel respectively

- 11road funds have their revenues channeled directly to their bank account

- Only about one third of road funds may now be meeting routine maintenance expenditure needs on a regular basis

 

 

That the Bill will achieve the following outputs:

a) Correct market signals to road users.

b) Efficient use of resources used in the maintenance of roads;

c) Constrained size and quality of the road network to what is affordable;

d) Sufficient revenues to operate and maintain the road network on a sustainable basis.

 

Top

 

QN: Road Management Reforms


From the 1990s, a majority of the Bank road projects focused on maintenance. Yet progress was erratic. Most countries did not have the capacity to increase and sustain budget funding for road maintenance at the required level. In response, the Bank in 1995 issued a report suggesting that the maintenance crisis could be effectively tackled by addressing four issues:

  • Ownership: Empower road users and encourage them to take an interest in the management of roads; an essential component of this concept was creation of a roads board.
  • Funding: Secure stable and adequate flows of funds.
  • Responsibility: Creation of an organizational structure for managing the different components of the road network.
  • Oversight: Management of a businesslike road agency, including strong financial management and accountability.
 

RESOURCES

Best Practices

Budget Speech

View Reports

Vital Downloads

Useful Links

 

______________________

______________________

 

 

 

 

 

 
   
   

Contact Us

Uganda Road Fund, C/O: Road Sector Development Programme (RSDP)

Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development |Finance Building, Apollo Kaggwa Road

P. O. Box 8147 Kampala, Uganda | Tel. +256 414 577 495 | Fax: +256 414 255 038

info@roadfund.ugrsdp@finance.go.ugComments About the Website